Animating Old Photos
A month or so ago I ran across something that I thought was fascinating, amazing, and a little bit disturbing. It was a short clip in a genealogy group that showed an old photograph. What was so different was that the person in the image blinked and turned their head slightly. It was just a short little two- or three-second clip. It looked like it was an ad for a website or for someone who had some type of software to create the short clips. I wondered what it would be like to see some of my own images of my ancestors with animation. Would it be eerie? Would it show their personality in a way that a photograph can’t? Would it help me connect with them by making them seem more real? I really didn’t pursue it much, but when I looked at some of my photos, I wondered how they would look animated. I even thought about looking to see what the cost of it might be. It was intriguing.
Then last weekend there was a genealogy conference online and it was free. How could I pass that up? So I signed up and went looking to see what I might learn from other people who are obsessed with their family history. I got distracted by a feature they had that showed you all of your relatives who had signed up for the programming. I had cousins from all the lines in my family. People who had Patureau, Phenice, Landry, Bucklin, Leveque, Hine, Keys, Stanbrough, McGrath, or other names in common with me.
As I was trying to get going with some of the programs available, I decided to look at my emails. I had gotten several reminders for the event with suggestions of “must watch” videos. Instead of finding that, I found a notice of a new feature on the website MyHeritage. They were announcing that they had acquired a program for animating photos. I had already paid for a year-long membership because of their feature for enhancing photos. (That and a deal of only paying 1/3 of the regular prices!) I’ve mentioned that feature before, because I have posted photos that have been enhanced. So now, in addition to enhancing (and/or coloring) photos, I can also animate them. Who needs a conference? I had some animating to do!
So that’s what I did all weekend. I have a lot of old photos. It’s really amazing to see some of those old photos come to life. The people in them can look sweet, pensive, or concerned with just a blink of an eye or a slight turn of the head. Like the first example I posted above. That one is of my great great grandmother Cathrine Jane “Kate” Foster Phenice. I grew up seeing one photo of her that my mother had. In that photo Kate was an older woman and she always reminded me of Grandpa Munster. I got this photo of Kate taken in 1890 from a cousin (thanks again, Mona!) a few years ago. It’s one of the first photos that I used with the enhancement feature and I was amazed with the results. It’s one of my favorites for the animation feature, too. Now when I think of my great great grandmother, I think of that impish smile from this video. I think that if I had known her, I would have been able to get her to grin like that. This is much better than thinking of her as a Grandpa Munster lookalike!
But how realistic is it? While I do find some really amazing looking animations, I go through so many more that I discard. I posted some of the better ones last weekend on Facebook. One of them was of me from the 2nd grade. I had originally discarded the first results it showed. It showed me looking up to the side and my eyes were badly crossed. That’s not how I looked back then. (Most of the time. I didn’t cross them often because my mom warned me they could get stuck like that!) When I found out that there were 10 options for each photo, I went back to my 2nd grade photo again and found an acceptable option. Yet even with the best results, I still get comments about the animations being “creepy” or “freaky” or “robotic.”
And they are right. Here is an animation of Kate’s granddaughter Myrtle Phenice. She was my maternal grandmother. We all called her Grandma. This was made from my favorite photo of Grandma. I was able to get a good version of the photo because of the enhancement feature I talked about. Yet, when I use the animation feature on it, I can’t get a good result. I can get something better than this one, but I’m using this as an example. It doesn’t leave me with a warm, fuzzy feeling like the first one. It’s the same exact process, but the results are more on the disturbing side.
While it is easy to accept the sweet, impish grin of Kate and to reject the distorted face of Myrtle, neither one of them could actually represent what the person was really like. While it may help you notice some features of someone that you might have overlooked, take it with a grain of salt. But I still think that I could have gotten Grandma Kate to smile like she does in the animation!