A Bucklin Dinosaur?

A few years ago, I was watching a Youtube video on dinosaurs and was really surprised when they mentioned William Buckland!  I immediately emailed Uncle Ray Bucklin since he always seemed to know something about most everything. As an educator, he would often guide us to find our own answers, but this time he went into research mode.

Ray replied, “William Bucklin is probably the most famous Buckland. … He is one of those early guys who didn’t get a lot of stuff quite right, but helped lay the foundation for modern science.”  Later that night, he had already figured out our common ancestor and showed how we were related.

William Buckland, a renowned geologist and paleontologist, lived from 1784 to 1856.  He was a professor of geology at Oxford University. Buckland was a pioneer in the study of dinosaurs and is credited with scientifically describing and naming the first dinosaur, Megalosaurus, in 1824. A few years later, the species was given the name Megalosaurus bucklandi. The term dinosaur didn’t come into existence for over a decade.  He also helped to develop the theory of catastrophism, which said that the Earth’s features were formed by sudden, violent events, such as floods and earthquakes. While the original concept of catastrophism has evolved, elements of it still exist within modern geology.

Megalosaurus, meaning “great lizard,” was a large carnivorous dinosaur that lived during the Middle Jurassic period, approximately 166 to 168 million years ago. Its discovery and Buckland’s subsequent research on this dinosaur were groundbreaking for the time. Megalosaurus served as one of the key pieces of evidence supporting the existence of ancient reptiles that once roamed the Earth.

The next time we met with Ray, we celebrated Mom’s birthday together and the gift Ray brought was a little Megalosaurus toy and he made it a name tag.  While cleaning out his house, I found he had the same dino toy on the shelf next to his computer.  It always surprised me that he managed to find a dinosaur toy based on a species I had never heard of. I guess being the “first dinosaur” makes the species toy worthy.

Given the similar body shape, you may wonder how related Megalosaurus is to T-Rex? They are both theropod dinosaurs, but they are not closely related and were separated by around 90 million years. Megalosaurus was around half the size, 23 to 33 feet long and 10 feet high at the hip.

Ray wrote, “So, the next time you are hanging out with a bunch of paleontologists or geologists, you can verify that yes, you are indeed related to William Buckland (1784-1856) of dinosaur fame.  The common ancestors were John Buckland (1540-?) and Dorothy Father.  It is possible that William Bucklin would have known his grandfather John Bucklin (1540-?) who would have been 66 when William was born.”

He calculated William Buckland (1784-1856) was Ray and Louise’s 8th cousin 3 times removed.  For Van Landry and I’s generation, that would be 8th cousin 4 times removed.

John Buckland (abt. 1540) & Dorothy Father  — Common Ancestors

  • Hughe Buckland (abt. 1570)
  • Thomas Buckland (1605) 
    • William Bucklin (1606-1683) 🦖
  • John Buckland (1634)
  • Lee Buckland (1655)
  • Nicholas Buckland (abt. 1678 – 1731)
  • Lee Buckland (1702 – abt. 1785)
  • William Buckland (abt. 1725)
  • Thomas Buckland (abt. 1757 – 1822)
  • William Buckland (abt. 1784 – 1861)
    • James Bucklin* (1821-1890) 👨‍🌾 (our ancestor, homesteaded in Louisiana)

I hope this glimpse into our family’s connection to William Buckland and his contributions to science has been interesting.  I wish I had gotten around to writing it while Ray was still with us.

Read more about Megalosaurus.

You can read Buckland’s original description of Megalosaurus.

Robert Joseph Landry, Jr. – 87 years, 11 months, 24 days

My parents Betty and Bob Landry were the longest-lived couple in my ancestry. This is a photo of them in 2011 in Galveston, Texas, at a family gathering.

If you read my post last week, you’ll know that this is a continuation of that one.  Again I will be discussing the longevity of my ancestors.  I looked through six generations (up to 4X great grandparents) and figured out as closely as I could the exact age they were at their death.  The most interesting thing I noticed was that both of my parents were in the top 10 for longevity.  I definitely got to benefit from that.

Last week the focus was on my mom’s side, so this week the focus is on my dad.  The amazing thing is that my dad outlived most of my other ancestors.  Only three ancestors outlived him.  When I was younger, I would have never agreed with anyone if they would have suggested that that would happen.  Both of his parents died from heart issues, and he had heart issues for a while.  

He’s like Nadal in the tennis world.  Everyone said that his aggressive style of tennis would take an early toll on his body and he wouldn’t last long.  He ended up having one of the longest careers of elite tennis players and has set many records.  My dad may not have set any world records, but I have been told that he is a legend!

The two longest-lived ancestors were on my mom’s side of the family.  The longest-lived ancestor from his side of the family made it the age of 90.  So she lived a year longer than he did.  That was accomplished by Marie Magdelena Babin, who lived two hundred years earlier.  She lived from 1725 to 1814, and Daddy lived from 1929 to 2017.  She was born in Acadie, married Augustin Landry around 1752 (my parents married in 1952), and ended up in Louisiana after being exiled by the English during the Grand Derangement.   What tales she could have told.

I find it interesting that the three ancestors who outlived all the rest did it against the odds.  All three of them survived events that took the lives of many of their contemporaries.  And they weren’t just any old event.  They each had an Event with a Capital Letter.  Like I mentioned last week, Samuel Charles Phenice (the oldest) survived being injured during the Civil War.  That was a war with many casualties.  The next oldest was Edward McGrath who was from Ireland.  And he wasn’t just an immigrant from Ireland, he survived the Irish Potato Famine.  That happened during the 1840s and about a million people perished from the Great Hunger.  Edward and his wife Ettadosia brought their children to the United States and settled in Massachusetts.  And now we see that one of those long-lived ancestors was a survivor of the Great Expulsion of the Acadians.  We are all descendants of survivors, and these were the long-lived ones.

On the other end of the spectrum were a few ancestors who lived only long enough to produce one offspring.  Most of my ancestors had large families.  That was true for both sides of my family.  And likewise each side of the family had a short-lived ancestor that only produced one offspring.  I’ll start with the runner up.  Can an ancestor who lived the shortest amount of time be considered the winner?  Hey, at least we are talking about him all these years later.  The winner and the runner up both lived about 200 years ago.  They were alive at the same time as Marie Magdelena Babin Landry.  The runner up was on my mom’s side of the family.  Peter Hine was her great great great grandfather.  He died on July 22, 1819, at the age of 24 years, 8 months, 12 days.  He died from consumption less than two months before the birth of his son.  He never knew his only child.

The winner of the Shortest Lived Ancestor goes to Simon Hebert.  He died on April 17, 1802, at the age of 24 years, 6 months.  It was a close contest – only two months separated the two.  The main difference between the two is that Simon was able to meet his only child.  Marie Carmelite Hebert was born two months before her father died.  Simon’s wife Marie Martha Hernandez would go on to marry a second time and have more children.  But she did not live very long herself.  In fact, she had the third-shortest lifespan of my ancestors.  She died on Dec. 22, 1814, at the age of 33 years, 11 months, 9 days.  So they are definitely the couple with the fewest years when looking at their combined ages.

In fact, I’ve outlived their combined age of 58 years and some months.  I’ve outlived almost forty of my ancestors.  I mentioned Augustin Landry earlier.  He lived 62 years and some days.  I’m a few months older than that.  His great granddaughter Emma Landry Patureau (my great great grandmother) died in 1892 at the age of 62 years, 2 months, 14 days.  She is the most recent of my ancestors that I have outlived.  My sister Karen outlived our ancestor Pierre Bruneteau who lived to the age of 63.  She did not outlive his daughter Celeste Bruneteau Landry who lived to 63 years, 5 months, 29 days.  Karen lived to 63 years, 4 months, 6 days.  My brother Al has outlived Karen and Celeste.  He will soon outlive Henry Keys (63 years, 10 months, 24 days).  My brother Rob has gone on to further outlive nine more of our ancestors, including our Pee Paw – Robert Joseph Landry, Sr. (64 years, 7 months, 19 days)

I plan to touch on this topic again in the future.  Possibly in 10 months, 25 days.  But who’s really counting?

Betty Lou Bucklin Landry – 83 Years, 8 Months

Karen, Mama, and Kelcie making my dad’s birthday cake in 2016.

This post isn’t just about my mom.  It’s about her and her ancestors.  I had to have a post about my mom this week – Sunday was Mother’s Day and her birthday is in two days.  This photo is from her last year.  It’s a photo of her (Betty Lou Bucklin Landry), my sister Karen, and Karen’s granddaughter Kelcie.  They were working together to make my dad’s (Robert Joseph Landry, Jr.) last birthday cake.  

They didn’t know it would be the birthday cake for his last birthday, but he turned 87 on January 31, 2016, and it was family tradition to make his favorite banana cake to celebrate.  (My favorite as well.)  This was at my sister’s house in Lake Charles, Louisiana.  

But technically, it wasn’t his last birthday cake.  My sisters made him a cake a bit early, but he was failing at that point.  He didn’t eat any of the cake and he died a week before his 88th birthday – 87 years, 11 months, 24 days.

The reason for the specific ages is that I’ve been curious about the ages of my ancestors at their death.  So I went through six generations of my ancestors to see how long they all lived.  I have two parents, four grandparents, and eight great-grandparents.  As you can see, it doubles every generation.  So the next two generations added forty-eight more.  I was tempted to stop with sixty-two ancestors.  That took a lot of ciphering to get the years, months, and days for the format I was using.  The format was used in a lot of death notices and on some tombstones.  If you’ve done any genealogy, you would have seen it. 

I decided to go ahead and take it back another generation.  With my dad’s side of the family, there were cousin marriages.  That means some of the ancestors showed up more than once.  It saved me a bit of time.  See, it comes in handy at times.  I didn’t have the information for some of them.  Hopefully I can remedy that in the future.  But I have a pretty good amount of information for what I wanted.  For the confirmed ages I have, only nine of them lived longer than my mom.  One of those was my dad.  Of the other eight who outlived her, five of them were her ancestors.  That included the One Who Outlived Them All – Samuel Charles Phenice.  Besides being famous for having been a witness to the Lincoln Assassination, he was my longest-lived ancestor.  Considering that he fought in the Civil War and was injured in the Battle of the Wilderness, that was quite a feat.  His count is 95 years, 4 months, 26 days.  You go, Grandpa Samuel!

Since both of my parents were in the Top Ten of the ancestors with the longest lives, they are the ancestral couple with the most years when adding both of their ages.  Or are they?  My mom’s maternal grandmother was Daisy Keys.  Her paternal grandparents were George Keys and Elizabeth Crouchman.  George Keys was born October 5, 1780, and he lived 86 years, 1 month, 22 days.  Elizabeth Crouchman died on Nov. 23, 1865, at the age of 84 years.  I don’t know her exact day of birth, just her age at death.  So when I add their ages together, I get 170 years, 52 days.  When I add my parents’ ages together, I get 171 years, 264 days.  (Roughly, I didn’t feel like figuring it out exactly and rechecking.  Too much like work!)  Even if Elizabeth was a day away from her 85th birthday, the grand total wouldn’t be enough to overthrow my parents’ total.  

So I was the fortunate one in my family history to have the longest-lived couple as my parents.  That was mainly due to my mom’s determination.  She made sure my dad got his heart issues checked.  He was able to have heart surgery, which prolonged his life.  My mom also cooked the healthiest meals that my dad would eat (he was very particular about what he would and wouldn’t eat) and they danced together all the time.  It seems to have been a good recipe for a long healthy life.

One more thing before I go.  Besides having the longest-lived ancestor on the Phenice side of her family, my mom also had the runner-up.  The runner-up was on the Bucklin side of her family.  My mom’s paternal grandfather was Louis Charles Bucklin.  Louis’s maternal grandfather was Edward McGrath, who lived to the ripe old age of 89 years, 11 months, 21 days.  He died just short of his 90th birthday.

Speaking of 90th birthdays.  This post is in honor of the 90th anniversary of my mom’s birth.  She was born May 20, 1933.

My Landry Grandparents in 1946

Members of the Landry family in Lake Charles, Louisiana, in 1946.

This is the second week in a row that I’m posting a blurry photo.  Have I run out of clear, sharp images?  No, of course not.  Though after posting over 400 photos, my choices have gotten smaller and smaller.  I have many photos that are sharper, but this is the one that called out to me this week.  Or maybe I should say that it resonated with something inside me.  The content of the photo is much more important than the quality of the photo.  But it’s nice when I can have both. 

I tried to sharpen it up a bit with some software, but the results weren’t accurate.  There isn’t enough information in the photo to guide the software to show what the people really looked like.  Some small feature may have been accurate – like droopy eyes – but the overall results didn’t look like the people I remember.  I wasn’t around back then, but I have other photos of them and know that the software images didn’t have enough to work with.  In the future, the software will be able to look at all of the other photos of the people, gather the information about their facial structure, and make an image clear enough to represent their faces from back then.  But in the meantime, we’ll just have to make do with the image we have.

This is a photo of my paternal grandparents.  They are on the left side of this photo.  Robert Joseph “Rob” Landry and Germaine Erie Patureau were married in 1921.  Rob and Erie began having children in 1923 and ended up with eight altogether – Marie, A. J., Hubert, Germaine, Bob (my dad), Wana, Framay, and Johnny.  Standing with Rob and Erie is their son Hubert with his new wife Mildred Sutherlin Landry.  I think this photo was taken on the day of their marriage, which was on July 20, 1946.  It is a sweet photo of a young married couple with the parents of the groom.

But when I look at this photo, I think of the things to come.  Though they were not the first of Rob and Erie’s children to marry – older sister Marie married Malloy Reeves on the first day of October in 1945 – they would be the first to provide them with a grandchild.  So they weren’t known as Mee Maw and Pee Paw at this point, but that would be changing soon when my godmother shows up.  She would make them grandparents.  When you think about it that way, it is an honor.  And my godmother doesn’t let anyone forget it.  No matter how many times we say it just makes her the oldest, she doesn’t care.  She was, is, and always will be The First.  She wears that designation like a tiara, and she wears it well.

Another thing that I think about is that I never knew Aunt Mildred when she was a cute, young, and ambulatory.  Of course I wouldn’t know her when she was young, because she was born almost forty years before I was.  But she also had polio, so she wasn’t able to walk on her own when I knew her.  My mom always spoke very highly of Hubert and Mildred.  She talked about their positive approach to dealing with her difficulties and his devotion to continually working with her to provide as much mobility as possible.  When our family was performing at Shakey’s in the late 1970s, they showed up more frequently than anyone else.  Uncle Hubert would play harmonica on many of the songs, so we got to visit with Aunt Mildred quite a bit.  She was a sweet lady.

But this photo mainly makes me regret that I never knew these grandparents as a couple.  They look very pleased to pose with their son and his wife.  I never saw that because my grandfather died before I was born.  I never got to call him Pee Paw.  I’ve heard many good things about him and from all accounts he and my grandmother were happily married.  So it must have been a profound change in my grandmother’s life when he died.  She was my age (62) when she became a widow.  I have friends who have lost their partners and it is a difficult transition.  

I didn’t mean for this post to be so tinted with sadness.  It’s a sweet photo from a very happy moment in their lives.  It gives me a bittersweet smile.

The Keys Family in England Circa 1878

The Keys at their home in the London area of England, in late1870s.

I’ve been planning on posting this photo for about six years.  I posted an inferior version of the photo in September of 2016.  That one came from a print in the Edith Keys Segraves’ book “Cook-Keys Family: Two Centuries in England and America.”  It looked like a Xerox copy of an old photo.  It was tolerable, but I wanted better.  Thankfully, Edith Keys Segraves took good care of the photo and passed it down to her children.  In 2017 I got in touch with one of her daughters, who graciously let me borrow several photos so I could scan them and photograph them.  (Thanks again, Carolyn!)

The Keys family that I’m talking about include my great great grandparents Henry Keys and Martha Cook Keys.  Before they were married, they each had their own professions.  Henry was a tinsmith for many years, while Martha had a successful dress shop in London.   Some people may have thought that Henry was a confirmed bachelor, because he was single until the age of 47.  But then at some point probably in the late 1860s, he met Martha Ann Cook.  Martha was no spring chicken herself – she was 32 or 33 at that time.  It must have been love.

They were married on November 8, 1869, at St. James Church in the Parish of Shoreditch.  I believe it was part of the Church of England.  After their wedding, they made their home at 6 Field View Terrace in Hackney.  Shoreditch is a district in the East End of London in England and forms the southern part of the London Borough of Hackney.  Both Henry and Martha continued their chosen professions, and while doing so they started a family.  How very modern of them!  Henry Alfred Keys (later known as “The Judge” by his family in Kinder, Louisiana) was born March 18, 1870.  (She had a very short pregnancy! 😉 ) Their next child was another son.  He was also their last son.  Leonard James Keys was born on April 16, 1873.  (He would later become the father of Edith Keys, the family historian.) 

Henry, Martha, Henry Alfred, and Leonard welcomed a new addition to the family on April 20, 1876.  Finally, they had a little girl.  They named her Daisy Henrietta Martha Keys.  Her middle names came from Martha and her younger sister Henrietta.  Henrietta had a Keys family of her own – she was married to Henry’s younger brother William.  So Daisy was born into a large family.  She had her parents, her brothers, several aunts and uncles, and many cousins including eight double first cousins.  Her double first cousins lived in the London area as well, though in the Islington area.  Of importance to me is that Daisy would later be the mother of my maternal grandmother Myrtle Phenice Bucklin – the source of my mitochondrial DNA.  But you can just refer to her as my great grandmother.

Next to join the family was Rosetta Ruth Keys.  Ruth was born on Jan. 13, 1879.  She was the last of the children to be born while the family lived at 6 Field View Terrace.  In about 1880 the family moved to 70 Tiverton Road in Tottenham.  I suppose they must have moved to a larger house to make room for their growing family.  It’s what families usually do.  Tottenham, like Islington, is in North London.  The family would be closer to Henrietta and William’s family.  It is also closer to Walthamstow, which is where Martha and Henriette’s Cook family were from.  There could be other family connections that I’m not aware of.

The last child of Martha and Henry was born December 8, 1881.  She was named Mabel.  I guess they decided five children would be enough.  Every family should have a fifth!  I just say this because I’m a fifth.  I’m not sure if Mabel had been born yet when this photo was taken.  The information I saw about it says that it was taken before 1884 in Hackney.  I’m thinking that if it was taken at the Keys home in Hackney, it would have been taken before 1880.  They moved to Tottenham after that.

Even though this photo is clearer than the first version I had, it’s still a bit blurry.  Henry looks rather dapper standing up in front just behind the iron fence.  He looks as though he may have been smoking a pipe.  This could just be a smudge on the photo.  I can’t tell for sure.  Martha is sitting down to the left of him.  There is nothing of her face to make out.  She does look like she was dressed nicely.  I can make out Henry Alfred standing in front of the window.  He is decidedly older than the boy to the right of him who must be Leonard.  The only other person I think I can make out is a little girl sitting to the right of the photo within the fenced area.  That would be little Daisy when she was a young girl!  

I’m thinking the photo was taken around 1878.  That’s before 1884, so I’m not contradicting the information I was given.  The next few years were probably an ideal time for little Daisy.  Her two little sisters were born, and she was probably learning to sew from her mother.  It was said that they learned at a very young age.  They had some good years before the tragic death of her father when she wasn’t quite 10 years old.  This photo was a view back to that sweet time in the family’s life.  That’s probably why it survived the years.  I’m glad it did.